Search Results
Search type | Search syntax |
---|---|
Tags | [tag] |
Exact | "words here" |
Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
Views | views:250 |
Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
URL | url:"*.example.com" |
Saves | in:saves |
Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
Types |
is:question is:answer |
Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
For more details on advanced search visit our help page |
For questions about works that derive their core from another open work.
4
votes
Is requiring a license a violation of the GPL? Can I get around it?
To answer the direct question: It is not necessarily a violation of the GPL to require a license. Let me describe a scheme which I believe would comply with the terms. I have no idea if the people you …
3
votes
Is it allowed to dynamically link a GPL licensed library for commercial use?
It depends on the views of the copyright owner as to the definitions of derived work versus aggregation. The FSF themselves take a very broad view of derived work that would forbid your use case; they …
4
votes
When is my project a derivative work in an interpreted language?
This answer is offered as a supplement to FreeRadical's fine exposition, and is focussed on subclasses.
I am not sure that it is helpful to focus on individual classes. Copyright law looks at a 'work …
4
votes
Appropriate licence for later merging back
This answer is an experiment; you and others may not like it, but we'll see.
You write that you wish to make money with code you plan to publish with a (more or less) open source license. You might w …
10
votes
Accepted
What license options do I have for licensing ported source code?
The conservative position is to assume that your port is a derived work of the original. If you consult a lawyer, you might be offered a more-or-less 'clean room' procedure to try to avoid this, but s …