Skip to main content

Explore our questions

2 votes
0 answers
51 views

Apache 2.0 API, GPL 3.0 Server side source code

4 votes
1 answer
772 views

Can a web-service based on AGPL 3.0 Licensed software demand money for its services?

3 votes
1 answer
37 views

Is the advertising clause 3 of the BSD-4-Clause overrated?

2 votes
1 answer
22 views

Implications of the AGPL 3.0 License for integrated methods

4 votes
1 answer
67 views

Is 2.11BSD source code encumbered?

1 vote
1 answer
44 views

What does invariant section in GNU FDL copyright note mean?

10 votes
1 answer
1k views

Is Firefox's about:license non-compliant wrt. MIT and BSD style Licenses?

3 votes
1 answer
167 views

Distributing datasets partly built with GPLv3 library

3 votes
2 answers
66 views

Does adding license headers to files without existing headers count as my modification to an Apache 2.0-licensed project?

2 votes
1 answer
174 views

Term to describe an open-source fork that wishes to remain a fork

6 votes
3 answers
235 views

How prohibitive is this Intel copyright clause in Microsoft Windows SDK sources?

5 votes
1 answer
661 views

Weak copyleft LGPL-like license for static linking

4 votes
1 answer
58 views

Adding autoconverting clause to AGPL?

21 votes
1 answer
5k views

When selling a machine with proprietary software that links against an LGPLv3 library, do I need to give the customer root access?

Browse more Questions