Skip to main content

Explore our questions

2 votes
1 answer
54 views

How can I license a project to be as "open" as possible, but deter commercial machine learning models from being trained on outputs?

8 votes
2 answers
374 views

Why would the GPL be viral, while EUPL isn't, according to the EUPL authors?

8 votes
3 answers
3k views

Combining GPL with non-commercial license

1 vote
0 answers
9 views

Proprietary uses licensed FOSS library: do I have to provide sources?

1 vote
1 answer
20 views

NuGet and LGPL libraries

2 votes
1 answer
130 views

Can a software vendor prohibit use of their open source / community edition software (GPLv3) after subscribing to their Enterprise license?

5 votes
1 answer
307 views

Potential Syscall Note Loophole?

17 votes
1 answer
7k views

Is there any particular reason to license docs with CC BY 4.0 rather than MIT?

5 votes
0 answers
58 views

Is adding this addtional clause to CC BY-SA material allowed?

7 votes
3 answers
1k views

Retroactively specifying `-only` or `-or-later` for GPLv2 in an adopted project

13 votes
2 answers
1k views

Can I use GPL v3 for source code and CC BY-SA v3 for comments?

14 votes
7 answers
8k views

Reusing own code at work without losing licence

3 votes
1 answer
50 views

Use GPL v3 project for internal use

12 votes
3 answers
2k views

Who owns code contributed to a license-free repository?

Browse more Questions