Skip to main content

All Questions

Tagged with
Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
2 votes
0 answers
43 views

EPL 2.0 and adding new files to the project

What happens when someone creates a fork of a library under EPL 2.0, and this fork modifies some files and adds some new files? I can see that the modified files should retain EPL2 license, but what ...
gavv's user avatar
  • 446
8 votes
1 answer
2k views

Why don't open source licenses give a more specific definition of "derivative works" to reduce ambiguity?

The Free Software Foundation is of the opinion that a program that links a library is a derivative work of that library, so a program that links to a GPL-licensed library would need to be distributed ...
Flux's user avatar
  • 743
6 votes
1 answer
687 views

Include Eclipse 2.0-licensed software in commercial closed source software

It is not clear for me if it is possible to include software licensed under Eclipse Public License (EPL) 2.0 in commercial closed software. I have found some related questions (1, 2, 3, 4, 5) that ...
fa__'s user avatar
  • 163
15 votes
3 answers
866 views

Does using Eclipse wizards to generate code make my software a derivative?

I am using Eclipse to code my program. After doing research on the Eclipse website I found that there was no clear answer to my question. My issue is that I need to be able to license my software ...
Trevor Clarke's user avatar