Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with creative-commons
Search options not deleted
user 50
For questions about the Creative Commons licenses and the organization behind them. There are many Creative Commons licenses, so if you are asking a question about a specific license be sure to state which one.
6
votes
Why is YouTube using 3.0 version of CC BY?
The entire point of YouTube's feature to programatically mark a video as under Creative Commons is to allow programmatic use of that video in YouTube's video editor. From the YouTube page on Creative …
- 37.7k
13
votes
Accepted
What are the consequences for downstream actors of redistributing a work under a wider CC li...
Company A is certainly liable for their misrepresentation of licensing terms. However, that does not legally excuse Company B's downstream distribution under those wrong terms; they have (accidentally …
- 37.7k
5
votes
Accepted
Which Creative Commons licenses are permissive enough for proprietary software?
You will probably only be able to use material under CC BY ("Creative Commons Attribution") licenses and no other CC licenses. Any other Creative Commons terms will be problematic:
Non-commercial (NC …
- 37.7k
5
votes
What are my obligations when citing myself on an SE site for an internal company blog?
The simplest answer is that you are the copyright holder, and Stack Exchange's license to your work is not exclusive, so you have unlimited rights to use your own work however you please. You cannot g …
- 37.7k
6
votes
Creative Commons ShareAlike (CC SA 1.0) is retired and not recommended for use, but there's ...
I would strongly advise against using any v1.0 Creative Commons license, since the most recent iteration is v4.0, and has made many improvements to clarity and enforceability (especially in varied int …
- 37.7k
7
votes
Accepted
Are old copies of "mistakenly licensed" OSS still subject to their previous licenses, even a...
Are the old commits in project A with MIT still considered MIT?
No, that code was never licensed under the MIT license: the individual(s) that made that offer to you never hard the right to make it …
- 37.7k
3
votes
Relation between the creative commons license and the patent process
The Creative Commons family of licenses are copyright licenses. They license the copyrightable expression contained in your work. A creative written text can be covered by copyright, granting the auth …
- 37.7k
1
vote
Accepted
Does CreativeCommon ShareAlike allow logo removal or rebranding
If you want to disallow modifications, you certainly want to use a NoDerivs license.
In general, CC BY-SA is just as permissive as plain CC BY-SA, with the exception that downstream changes must rema …
- 37.7k
3
votes
Whom to leave link credit while using CC BY images
The image in question is licensed under CC BY 2.0, which requires in section 4(b) [emphasis mine]:
You must keep intact all copyright notices for the Work and give the Original Author credit reaso …
- 37.7k
14
votes
How can I license a YouTube commercial which includes CC BY-SA Licensed music?
The Creative Commons organization has a page on Legal Music For Videos which states (emphasis mine):
Under CC licenses, synching the music to images amounts to transforming the music, so you can’t …
- 37.7k
1
vote
How do I specify particular "source code" for a non-software GPL'd work?
I think you may be confused by the "as long as it is clear" langauge of that FAQ item. The FAQ item isn't saying that you must make it clear what the source form of a work is, but rather it is saying …
- 37.7k
29
votes
Accepted
Is re-encoding an audio or video file permitted under CC-BY-ND?
CC BY-ND 4.0 says in section 2(a)(4):
Media and formats; technical modifications allowed. The Licensor authorizes You to exercise the Licensed Rights in all media and formats whether now known or …
- 37.7k
5
votes
Accepted
CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 rights as a contributor to the original repository on Github
If the project had you and other contributors formally sign a contributor licensing agreement (CLA) that outlines terms under which the project may use contributions, then the project maintainer can u …
- 37.7k