Timeline for Licensing a segmentation dictionary derived from CC SA-BY source (Wikipedia)
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2018 at 7:42 | vote | accept | eiennohito | ||
| Dec 14, 2018 at 7:40 | comment | added | eiennohito | Basically, yes. | |
| Dec 11, 2018 at 12:57 | comment | added | Brandin | This means you are copying a subset of entries? | |
| Dec 11, 2018 at 4:02 | comment | added | eiennohito | We want to use only factual information from wiktionary entries. | |
| Dec 11, 2018 at 3:45 | comment | added | eiennohito | @Brandin We want the default dictionary to be usable in commercial (not only academic) settings. CC SA-BY allows that if I understand it correct. The question is whether the combined segmentation dictionary should be licensed under CC SA-BY. | |
| Dec 10, 2018 at 10:20 | answer | added | amon | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 10, 2018 at 6:06 | comment | added | Brandin | Could you say what you mean by "we use some Wikipedia and Wiktionary data for enriching the segmentation dictionary"? What and how you use the data will make a difference whether your dictionary is likely to be a derivative work or not. | |
| Dec 10, 2018 at 6:04 | comment | added | Brandin | Strongly related: Using Wiktionary data in mobile app | |
| Dec 10, 2018 at 6:03 | comment | added | Brandin | What do you mean by "permissively licensed"? Do you consider CC SA-BY to be permissively licensed? | |
| Dec 10, 2018 at 4:20 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 10, 2018 at 6:40 | |||||
| Dec 10, 2018 at 4:19 | history | asked | eiennohito | CC BY-SA 4.0 |