Timeline for How can you guarantee someone that your open sourced code is what's being used in production?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 15, 2017 at 18:12 | vote | accept | metersk | ||
May 13, 2017 at 20:28 | comment | added | apsillers♦ | Possibly a duplicate of Is there any way to assert that a source code correspond to a compiled code? but it's not perfectly clear to me that the intent of "used in production" here is the same as "compiled form" | |
May 13, 2017 at 1:14 | history | edited | unor | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body; edited tags
|
May 12, 2017 at 19:22 | answer | added | amon | timeline score: 6 | |
May 12, 2017 at 17:02 | comment | added | metersk | Yea that is one reason | |
May 11, 2017 at 18:56 | comment | added | amon | Why is this proof necessary? For security reasons (to prove that you didn't insert a backdoor)? Or for some other reason? | |
May 11, 2017 at 17:38 | review | First posts | |||
May 11, 2017 at 21:00 | |||||
May 11, 2017 at 17:35 | history | asked | metersk | CC BY-SA 3.0 |