Revisions to Differences between Firefox and Iceweasel

edited body

Source Link

edited Jun 28, 2015 at 7:21

9.6k
2
30
71

IseweaselIceweasel is a fork of Firefox which was made by the Debian project because the license conditions of the Firefox name and logo violate the Debian Free Software Guidelines.

Did Debian do any other changes to Firefox which were not just cosmetic?

The differences are only relevant inasmuch as they're related to open-sourceness. http://meta.opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/176/do-we-want-to-allow-question-about-specific-instances-of-open-source-products

Source Link

edited Jun 27, 2015 at 14:34

Philipp

12.1k
2
31
52

Iseweasel is a fork of Firefox which was made by the Debian project because the license conditions of the Firefox name and logo violate the Debian Free Software Guidelines.

What doesDid Debian needdo any other changes to change in Firefox to make Iceweasel compliant with the DFSGwhich were not just cosmetic?

The differences are only relevant inasmuch as they're related to open-sourceness. http://meta.opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/176/do-we-want-to-allow-question-about-specific-instances-of-open-source-products

Source Link

edit approved Jun 27, 2015 at 14:34

Gilles 'SO- stop being evil'

2k
1
14
26

IceweaselIseweasel is a fork of Firefox which was made by the Debian project because the license conditions of the Firefox name and logo violate the Debian free software guidelinesFree Software Guidelines.

Except for the name and logo, doWhat does Debian need to change in Firefox to make Iceweasel compliant with the two branches have any non-cosmetic differencesDFSG?

Source Link

asked Jun 27, 2015 at 13:28

Philipp

12.1k
2
31
52

Loading

Stack Exchange Network

Return to Question