Timeline for Shipping GPL'd binaries in commercial product
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 2017 at 13:00 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
replaced http://opensource.stackexchange.com/ with https://opensource.stackexchange.com/
|
|
| Jun 6, 2016 at 13:59 | comment | added | tdenniston | Thank you, I think this is the conclusion that I also reached, but it's good to see other non-lawyers agree. I also have no problem publishing and distributing the source of the modified TexLive. Also @StephenKitt raised a good point that much of TexLive is licensed under LPPL, so I will have to consider that as well. | |
| Jun 6, 2016 at 13:55 | vote | accept | tdenniston | ||
| Jun 2, 2016 at 9:07 | comment | added | Tim Malone | @richard I don't think price was any part of my answer (or the question)? Re citing the quote, I linked to the FAQ answer that it came from directly above it | |
| Jun 2, 2016 at 8:59 | comment | added | ctrl-alt-delor | Can you cite your quote. | |
| May 31, 2016 at 22:06 | history | edited | Tim Malone | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 69 characters in body
|
| May 31, 2016 at 22:00 | history | answered | Tim Malone | CC BY-SA 3.0 |