Timeline for So the GPL doesn't restrict the creator of the software in any way?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Apr 12 at 15:20 | comment | added | MadHatter♦ | As it says, in the EU, third-party rights exist, which means that someone other than the rightsholder may sue. To say otherwise is wrong, at least according to Actual Lawyers. | |
Apr 12 at 14:39 | comment | added | x64 | @MadHatter all that is written in your source is that in US third-party rights "depend on the wording", in UK "no third-party rights exist" and in EU "third-party rights do exist, and specific performance is available". With such a degree of clarity what is all about, I will rather stick to my original interpretation. | |
Apr 12 at 11:05 | comment | added | MadHatter♦ | This is not true everywhere. The rights of someone other than the licensor and licensee to sue for infringement (third-party rights) vary by jurisdiction. This LWN article explains in much more length (full disclosure: I wrote the article, but I did not give the talk on which it is based). | |
Jul 2, 2023 at 5:04 | comment | added | x64 | No if they have no code ownership. | |
Jul 1, 2023 at 3:35 | comment | added | Pacerier | Well, you can be sued by FSF | |
Jan 6, 2016 at 11:54 | history | edited | x64 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 81 characters in body
|
Jan 6, 2016 at 11:49 | history | answered | x64 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |