New answers tagged

-2 votes

Problems with the MIT license - does this fix it?

Several points: That should be proposed SPDX code. "It is generally accepted..." - citation required Ask CoPilot - "does "the software" in the mit license refer to the ...
JohnScott's user avatar
4 votes

Problems with the MIT license - does this fix it?

It is generally accepted that 'the software' in the MIT license refers to 'the source code' I don't believe that many people take this view. In fact, you're the first I've ever heard of. I'd argue ...
Toby Speight's user avatar
8 votes

Problems with the MIT license - does this fix it?

I don't believe this license works at all. It is very deliberate in the MIT License that it does not specify "source code" so that binaries derived from the source code can be distributed. ...
Philip Kendall's user avatar
2 votes

Do I need permissions to list companies using my library?

There is nothing to indicate from just a discussion, or issue or code submission, that a particular company has distributed software using your library. (Or is even using your library, for that matter;...
cjs's user avatar
  • 191
1 vote

Do I need permissions to list companies using my library?

Alternatively you can put this heading: Used by That way it's not in any way an explicit endorsement or claim of trust by those companies. But what it does give you is a way to list Google, ...
Samuel Marks's user avatar
10 votes
Accepted

Do I need permissions to list companies using my library?

The requirement to include the copyright notice and MIT license statement means that at best customers of those companies should be able to know that your library is being used in the product, or ...
Bart van Ingen Schenau's user avatar

Top 50 recent answers are included