Skip to main content

New answers tagged

2 votes

Combining GPL with non-commercial license

This is an addon to the other answers. GPL does not require you to share your work if the code is not used outside of your organization. Be aware of what constitutes "distribution". I plan ...
xenoterracide's user avatar
4 votes

How can I license a project to be as "open" as possible, but deter commercial machine learning models from being trained on outputs?

As mentioned in the question Is the output of an open source program licensed the same?, the license of an application or library does normally not affect the license of the output generated with that ...
Bart van Ingen Schenau's user avatar
0 votes

Reusing own code at work without losing licence

I know it's a little more effort and not sure which language this is in but why not simply release this as a library and avoid the confusion and discussion entirely. That way your library can be ...
Dylan Watson's user avatar
3 votes

Who owns code contributed to a license-free repository?

The repository is just a publication channel, it does not change anything about the license under which somebody publishes. Many public repositories are owned by projects or other entities that won't ...
toolforger's user avatar
12 votes

Who owns code contributed to a license-free repository?

A repository with no license is "All rights reserved". That is, the owner of the repository is sole owner of all its code. It also means that this person is the only one who is allowed to ...
Bart van Ingen Schenau's user avatar
7 votes

Who owns code contributed to a license-free repository?

It seems like submitting a pull request [...] involves an implied permission to incorporate my code. Implied permission, yes. However as I think you've worked out, implied permissions are not ...
Philip Kendall's user avatar
-2 votes

Reusing own code at work without losing licence

People have mentioned how things can go wrong - it's always been smooth for me as long as I communicate. I've even gone a step or two further by going the other way around. For code I already have, I ...
Sensei's user avatar
  • 1
-1 votes

Reusing own code at work without losing licence

Like others have said. Your employers can really screw you on this. If you have personal code and you want to use it at work. The best thing to do is license it and plaster it all over in a public ...
Altera's user avatar
  • 1
-1 votes

Reusing own code at work without losing licence

If you work for Amazon and signed the standard paperwork, then you gave them EXCLUSIVE future control over any open source code you may have previously created that you re-use in your work for them. ...
matt2000's user avatar
  • 107
7 votes

Reusing own code at work without losing licence

If you wrote it in your own time, then you are the copyright owner. But if you work on it or update it during work time using company resources and/or use it in your company's products, and if you ...
ruben2020's user avatar
  • 2,731
-1 votes

Reusing own code at work without losing licence

Under copyright law, you wrote the code so you own it If you wrote something at work then probably something in your contract states "if you did it on work time then the company owns it" - ...
jgn's user avatar
  • 1
26 votes
Accepted

Reusing own code at work without losing licence

For me, question one is whether your employer is happy with this. They may have opinions about code appearing in their codebase to which they do not hold the copyright, so ask them before you do this....
MadHatter's user avatar
  • 51.1k

Top 50 recent answers are included