A message from our CEO about the future of Stack Overflow and Stack Exchange. Read now.

New answers tagged

3

Forbidding someone from redistributing or selling the work is considered a restriction that prevents a license from being an open source license. This means that there cannot be any open source licenses that meet your requirements. What you could do is to use the Apache 2.0 license and use the attribution mechanism of that license to ensure people get at ...


1

Exactly how should I change that statement now that I am technically the author but (a) need to acknowledege that I derived this code from existing code of another author, and (b) meet the terms of license? Actually, you are not the author of the file. You are one of the authors, because multiple authors have now made changes to the file. You must leave ...


2

Note that the opencontainers/go-digest part of the repository has 2 license files, LICENSE.code and LICENSE.docs. Based on the file extensions, one appears to contain the license for the source code and the other for the documentation. The .go files themselves and the LICENSE.code file all refer to the Apache 2.0 license as being applicable. It appears that ...


Top 50 recent answers are included