New answers tagged license-compatibility
3
Firstly, the GNU Project advises against using the term “MIT licence”, as it is ambiguous. See their comments on the Expat and X11 licences.
Now, on with the question:
I like to make my work public by using GPLv2-Only. This because its pretty clear with the copyleft: Use my work for whatever purpose you want, but if you change it or make it better, give it ...
8
A.) My-GPLv2-Only-Solution + MIT Lib
Yes, this is compatible. The combination must be licensed as a whole under the GPLv2, and the MIT parts do not impose any restrictions that make this as-a-whole licensing a problem. You can follow both licenses simultaneously, so they are compatible.
B.) My-GPLv2-Only-Solution + GPLv3+
This combination cannot be ...
Top 50 recent answers are included
Related Tags
license-compatibility × 318licensing × 93
gpl × 83
gpl-3 × 48
mit × 47
license-recommendation × 41
apache-2.0 × 34
lgpl × 29
gpl-2 × 26
cc-by-sa × 24
bsd × 22
relicensing × 22
agpl-3.0 × 17
multi-licensing × 16
creative-commons × 14
derivative-works × 13
commercial × 12
proprietary-code × 11
license × 11
copyleft × 10
license-notice × 9
linked-libraries × 8
epl × 8
java × 7
mpl × 7