New answers tagged

0

I am not a lawyer, but I don't see any glaring holes in those additional permissions. The only thing that has me very slightly worried is the sentence about the Corresponding Source at the end of the first permission (Now removed in an update of the question). I had to read the license text very carefully to convince myself that it doesn't contradict the ...


2

I would suggest designing the software so as to allow a user to supply a set of icons, and include with it a set of functional (but not necessarily attractive) icons that you would allow to be freely distributable under GPL, and bundle it with an alternate set of icons which is explicitly not part of the GPL-licensed package, but which users may load into it....


Top 50 recent answers are included