Last call to make your voice heard! Our 2022 Developer Survey closes in less than a week. Take survey.

New answers tagged

0 votes

Is AGPLv3 "sticky" for commercial clients's clients? (embeddable script)

In GPL (and AGPL) there is no distinction between commercial or non-commercial distribution. The rules apply in the same way. When you client creates a website that embeds the JS code, which is under ...
user avatar
6 votes
Accepted

AGPL library usage for an internal software

It depends. It depends on the architecture of your software. If the AGPL-licensed package is just used in an back-end application on a server, and not exposed to 3rd party interaction (through a proxy ...
user avatar
2 votes

Dual licensing AGPL 3.0/EUPL 1.2

This is indeed one case where, as the original or sole copyright holder, dual licensing EUPL / AGPL makes sense, since the two licenses are both copyleft and similar on the key point of covering "...
user avatar
7 votes
Accepted

Dual licensing AGPL 3.0/EUPL 1.2

So long as you are the sole copyright holder (or have the consent of all copyright holders), you can license code under any combination of licenses you like, including mutually incompatible ones (e.g. ...
user avatar

Top 50 recent answers are included