New answers tagged agpl-3.0
3
I'm fairly sure I know what it means, but I have as yet no examples of its use. I think it's designed for use cases along the lines of Cygnus, where a company distributes another party's (A)GPLv3 code to customers who are paying for a support contract, or for some other assumption of responsibility, for issues with the code.
Such parties as Cygnus are "...
answered Dec 2 at 12:00
4
If I was to fork the project from the last code point - the only license available to me would be AGPL?
I will assume that "the last code point" refers to the las commit that is positively identified as being open-source and under the AGPL license.
Technically the answer is no, but practically it is yes.
Technically, you can provide your modifications ...
2
I believe requiring .js files is definitely a dynamic linking. It's not much different from linking a library in your project for the use of library's functionality, which would be considered using the library as a plugin by GPL:
Linking a GPL covered work statically or dynamically with other modules is making a combined work based on the GPL covered work....
Top 50 recent answers are included
Related Tags
agpl-3.0 × 120licensing × 32
gpl × 22
license-compatibility × 11
gpl-3 × 9
derivative-works × 9
commercial × 9
copyleft × 9
license-recommendation × 8
apache-2.0 × 8
copyright × 6
proprietary-code × 6
multi-licensing × 6
website × 6
mit × 5
license-notice × 5
lgpl × 4
gpl-2 × 4
license × 4
relicensing × 3
source-code × 3
bsd × 2
contributor-agreements × 2
java × 2
monetization × 2