All Questions

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
3 votes
0 answers
19 views

Am I free to use Intel syntax in an Apache/BSD-3 licensed disassembler?

My project, strop, includes a disassembler for each of the CPUs it supports. One of the CPUs is the KR580VM1, an Intel 8080 derivative from Soviet Ukraine. Like many projects in the Rust ecosystem, ...
user avatar
  • 143
0 votes
1 answer
24 views

What GPL license to use on a Linux distro

What license should we use on a new linux distribution? I'm new in licensing and this really confuses me. Most "direct" programs, like desktop and the kernel itself, are licensed under GPLv2 ...
user avatar
  • 3
0 votes
0 answers
22 views

On Mac OS X, if a resource is created or edited with the GPL-licensed Rezilla utility, is the resource a derivative work of the Rezilla software?

On the Mac OS X platform, there is an open source resource editor utility called Rezilla. For those that are unfamiliar, a lot of the Rezilla utility’s functionality is similar to that of the ResEdit ...
user avatar
-2 votes
0 answers
54 views

One Stop Information About Commericialization of Apache Projects [closed]

Observation: I got to know that commercialization of Apache Software Foundation's(ASF) projects is possible. Examples of My Observation: For example, Astronomer company(https://www.astronomer.io/) has ...
user avatar
2 votes
0 answers
41 views

Can a program that uses a GPL library be closed source if it is distributed without the GPL library?

Suppose I create software that uses a library licensed under the GPL. If I distribute the software including the library, the software would have to be licensed under the GPL as well. But what if I ...
user avatar
  • 297
7 votes
3 answers
675 views

CC-By-SA: Can the author update his past creation when updating his name?

I'm working at Pl@ntNet which contributes a lot of plant observations (around 20M) online under cc-by-sa. On the app, a user can edit their profile and change their display name. But doing so will ...
user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
447 views

With GPLv3, do I have to bundle the source code with my deliverable or "provide a means" to obtain it?

I am planing to release a software I have written as donationware (free to download, donate if you want to support the development). However, it is bundling and (dynamically) linking to another ...
user avatar
  • 143
2 votes
1 answer
37 views

Does LGPLv3 Tivoization apply to non "User Products"?

LGPLv3 section 4e: Provide Installation Information, but only if you would otherwise be required to provide such information under section 6 of the GNU GPL, and only to the extent that such ...
user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
47 views

Is saving a book in a company's server or cloud considered commercial use? [closed]

I am failing to understand what things could be included in "commercial use". I have downloaded a book that has a license that says: This work is licensed under the Attribution-...
user avatar
  • 101
3 votes
1 answer
368 views

Which open source licenses comply with the Microsoft Public License?

Clause 3 (D) of the Microsoft Public License says: If you distribute any portion of the software in source code form, you may do so only under this license by including a complete copy of this ...
user avatar
  • 297
2 votes
0 answers
41 views

MIT license modify package and names

Have downloaded code that is under the MIT license, and will modify parts of the code, as well as rename classes, namespaces and files, and relicense the code under one or all of the following ...
user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
42 views

Can GPLv3 contributions to a separate project be used without attribution?

I recently forked a relatively new GPLv3 project on GitHub, as it had seemingly been abandoned not long after its creator had published it, and I wanted to make some improvements, as it was in a ...
user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
54 views

AGPL-licensed Discord bot

If a Discord bot is licensed under the AGPL, do users in the Discord server have to have access to the source code? It only sends messages; it's not an interactive bot.
user avatar
  • 161
-2 votes
2 answers
71 views

Found a project with WTFPL, but I think it is a translation of another MIT-licensed project

Let's say a project was called projectMIT and it was written in python. it was not maintained and as of now, it is publicly archived on github. Someone re-wrote it as project(MIT)-rust with WTFPL ...
user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
555 views

REST Endpoint using MIT and BSD 3-clause license libraries

I am making a small side project to make a few dollars. The project basically consists of a couple of RESTful endpoints. My endpoints use various libraries released under MIT and BSD 3-clause licenses,...
user avatar
  • 51
5 votes
1 answer
95 views

Can a company offering a dual-license AGPL/paid commercial product require commercial users to purchase a commercial license?

When I was working through a problem I was having with MinIO, I noticed that in a bug report on Github, one of the project owners made this comment to a bug reporter: Also remember if you are using ...
user avatar
  • 383
3 votes
1 answer
84 views

Complying with MySQL GPLv2

Consider the case of MySQL. This software is Dual-Licensed, of which, one license is GPLv2 the other is a somewhat costly enterprise license. Given the following criterion, what are my obligations? I ...
user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
44 views

Is an output of a program (almost) always not bound to its generator's license? [duplicate]

As far as I understand, it is well accepted that, for programs that are licensed under the GPL, the output of a program does not necessarily have to follow the GPL. This is confirmed by the "...
user avatar
  • 1
-1 votes
1 answer
53 views

How to retrieve copyright from contributors [duplicate]

I have recently taken some time to study different licenses and I was wondering: If I have a open source project and other people contribute, how do I receive the copyright? Or is it possible to not ...
user avatar
  • 9
-3 votes
0 answers
55 views

What are the differences between LGPL and GPLv2 [duplicate]

I dont really understand the differences between the LGPL and GPLv2 license
user avatar
  • 9
4 votes
2 answers
791 views

Adding features that are similar to a proprietary program

I have an open source discord bot which I've built myself and I liked a feature of another proprietary discord bot. So can I implement almost similar feature to my bot? Will that violate copyright ...
user avatar
  • 143
7 votes
2 answers
2k views

License allowing mixing code only with code licensed with any of the OSI-approved licenses, getting "infected" by these licenses (kind of reverse GPL)

Does anything like that exist? So, let's say: if someone want to use my code in his MIT project, he can use is under MIT license. If he wants to use it in his GPL project, the code will be licensed to ...
user avatar
3 votes
1 answer
370 views

Using a Library Under MIT License with Patented Algorithms

If a library is licensed under the MIT license but has patented algorithms in its source, can I just pull out the source files I need that don't contain any of the aforementioned material and ...
user avatar
  • 133
4 votes
1 answer
84 views

linking closed source with linux-vdso.so.1

I understand that if we link closed source code with GPL library then closed source will be considered as a derived work of GPL and it needs to be distributed. "Linking is the technical process ...
user avatar
1 vote
1 answer
71 views

Should I include the licenses of my dependencies' dependencies?

I'm considering adding an MIT licensed library to my code as a raw C file. Currently, my library is only licensed under my LGPL license. If I was to add this MIT licensed C file and its corresponding ...
user avatar
-1 votes
0 answers
37 views

Do I have to include anything in my project if I do not include the source code of the libraries themselves? [duplicate]

I have 2 dependencies that my Python project uses: One is a library licensed under the BSD-3 Clause license, and the other one is a library licensed under a custom license, which can be found here (...
user avatar
  • 1
-1 votes
1 answer
45 views

Using Linux Kernel Bits in a Apache License v2 software

On a project with an Apache License v2 I intent to include a (heavily) modified source file of the Linux kernel, the file in question is list.h. I am aware that the Linux Kernel is GPL v2 meaning that ...
user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
49 views

Does the Reciprocal Public Licence require notifications only to be given to the first original licensor?

If person A creates a work under RPL-1.5 and person B creates a work based on person A's work, person B has to notify person A with the changes. If person A then uses these changes and continues to ...
user avatar
6 votes
4 answers
3k views

Could a license that allows later versions impose obligations or remove protections for licensors in the future?

If a project is licensed under GPL-2.0-or-later/MPL1.*, to what extent could the FSF/Mozilla releases a new version that imposes obligations or removes protections for licensors? Some examples: Could ...
user avatar
  • 89
-1 votes
0 answers
32 views

What open source license prohibits selling modified software [duplicate]

There is piece of software I want to be free to use or modify (MIT), however I want to prohibit case where someone comes and modify my code to sell it or even sell without modification. I would ...
user avatar
  • 99
3 votes
1 answer
54 views

Bug in FFmpeg build allows GPL filter use from an LGPL build can I distribute FFMPEG as LGPL

I have build ffmpeg libraries configured for LGPL on multiple OS's looking to be called from my own code using ffmpeg filters to deinterleave video. below is the configure command. ./configure --...
user avatar
7 votes
2 answers
826 views

Does software released under GPLv3 require a copyright notice?

If a project using GPL-3.0-or-later doesn't include a copyright notice, does it violate the license? What would the consequences be? I'm asking because https://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl-faq.html#...
user avatar
  • 225
3 votes
2 answers
1k views

Can we change licence from AGPL v3.0 to BSL v1.1?

We have code that is under the license AGPL v3.0 can we change it to BSL v1.1 (Business source license) The AGPL v3.0 says that Everyone is permitted to copy and distribute verbatim copies of this ...
user avatar
  • 51
5 votes
1 answer
1k views

Can we use a previous release of an open source project when it had Apache 2.0 license for commercial purpose?

If an open source project which had Apache 2.0 license, has now changed its license to non-commercial use license, can we use a previous release(when it was free for commercial use) of the project for ...
user avatar
  • 153
0 votes
1 answer
68 views

How mixing MIT-licensed code with GPLv3 project works?

I have a GPLv3 project and MIT licensed code that would be useful and I want to use said MIT-licensed code. I heard that MIT is GPLv3 compatible but at the same time MIT license requests not removing ...
user avatar
5 votes
2 answers
116 views

Can I release Mathematica codes under GPL, given Mathematica is a closed source software?

I have written some code in Mathematica, and want to make these codes available in GitHub when my paper would be published. Can I release Mathematica notebooks under GPL3? Mathematica itself is a ...
user avatar
0 votes
1 answer
33 views

What file(s) (on GitHub) should have the copyright owner's name for GPL3?

Lots of projects on GitHub have a GPL3 License, as it's easily created by their software when you want to add a license and you choose GPL3. However, unlike the MIT license, you don't put your own ...
user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
424 views

How to know if you can trust a third party open source plugin? (flutter)

Disclaimer: The plugin's dev has put a lot of work into it, so I don't wanna talk bad about the plugin!! I'm only working in IT since 2 years and from his Github profile he seems way more experienced, ...
user avatar
  • 141
0 votes
1 answer
16 views

Correct license for header only library

I want to distribute a header only library and I think that the spirit of the LPGL license is very much what I want. In particular, however, I want that a 3rd party that uses my library and modifies ...
user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
78 views

Relicensing a library to GPL when an MIT-licensed program depends on it

I wrote a library and released it under the MIT license. Another developer and I started another project that depends on my library; it is also under the MIT license. I want to relicense my library ...
user avatar
  • 161
1 vote
2 answers
37 views

Modified version of AGPLv3 software in commercial use - What to expose

we are using an opensource web application for front end UI of our software which is AGPLv3 based. The software also has middleware and back end data base as well The modified software will be sold ...
user avatar
  • 11
-2 votes
0 answers
38 views

What I should do to change the License from MIT to BSD-3-Clause in forked project?

I forked this chrome-extension-boilerplate-react-vite project, rename my project to chrome-extension-boilerplate-vue-vite and did some changes in source code. The original project is have MIT license, ...
user avatar
4 votes
1 answer
67 views

Is a project structure covered by that project's license?

I'm starting to work on a new UI application written in C#, so the MVVM pattern invites itself. However, I have little experience working with it and I need to learn a bit more before I can use it. ...
user avatar
2 votes
1 answer
80 views

Web app with GPLv3 license, What does it mean by "6. If you modify it, you have to indicate changes made to the code."?

Apologize for my limited English skill. A web app with GPLv3 license on GitHub, I plan to use it and hopefully Ads revenue can help pay for the VPS and my time of maintaining it. By using it, I will ...
user avatar
  • 23
7 votes
1 answer
862 views

Can I convert an Apache 2.0 project to GPLv2

I found a project on GitHub that I really liked, and have since forked and modified it. It's currently licensed under Apache 2.0. Can I release my modified project as a project with a new name under ...
user avatar
4 votes
3 answers
1k views

Why don’t unprivileged user accounts violate the GPLv3?

The GPLv3 says: Some devices are designed to deny users access to install or run modified versions of the software inside them, although the manufacturer can do so. This is fundamentally incompatible ...
user avatar
  • 274
5 votes
1 answer
334 views

PolyForm Noncommercial 1.0.0 license is proprietary software?

I saw an interesting project for self-hosting. Umbrel is licensed under the PolyForm Noncommercial 1.0.0 license. TL;DR — You're free to use, fork, modify, and redestribute Umbrel for personal and ...
user avatar
  • 153
2 votes
0 answers
29 views

Binary-only include Eclipse Public License: EPL 1.0 into a Apache 2.0 project [duplicate]

I am planning to binary-include(only to package it into release in build, not include it in the source) an EPL v1.0 library in my Apache 2.0 project. What I will do are: ensure the lib is not code/...
user avatar
  • 63
0 votes
0 answers
49 views

Is an offset pointer implementation trivial enough not to be covered by copyright?

This article discuss the question of whether a "hello world" program is protected by copyright. It comes to the conclusions that it is not (under US copyright law) because most of it is ...
user avatar
0 votes
0 answers
64 views

When does an implemention cease being trivial and become covered by copyright?

This article discuss the question of whether a "hello world" program is protected by copyright. It comes to the conclusions that it is not (under US copyright law) because most of it is ...
user avatar

15 30 50 per page
1
2 3 4 5
85