All Questions

Tagged with
Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
2
votes
0answers
48 views

MIT license alternative with explicit trademark use protection [closed]

Do you know a license, if possible approved by the Open Source Initiative, that's very similar to the MIT license but has explicit trademark use protection like the MLP 2.0 license?
1
vote
1answer
66 views

How to distribute a project under MPL v2.0 only?

I want to use a weak copyleft license for some new software project of mine. When reading the MPL v2.0 license text I stumbled over the following lines in section 10: 10.2. Effect of New Versions You ...
2
votes
0answers
72 views

Licensing auto-generated code under MPL 2.0?

I am writing a specialized binary file parser using Kaitai Struct. In brief, the file formats are described in YAML documents according to a custom spec called KSY, which are then passed to a code ...
3
votes
2answers
249 views

Is it OK to put license note that uses "this code/file/work" into a separate file?

MPL & CC-BY-SA both allow putting only a small license statement to place I deem fit. But both of them use "this": This Source Code Form is subject to the terms of the Mozilla Public License ...
5
votes
1answer
373 views

Javassit: What has to be distributed when using the pre-compiled .jar?

I am using Javassist within my free open-source project (Javassist is included as pre-built .jar file which has been downloaded from the Releases section on their page, no source code). I'm now ...
1
vote
1answer
112 views

Copyrighting open source code using a business name vs as an individual

I'm the only developer working on an open source project (MPL v2.0 license, not sure if it does matter) and I have a single-person LLC I use for some consulting works. What are the pros and cons of ...