Stack Exchange Network

Stack Exchange network consists of 175 Q&A communities including Stack Overflow, the largest, most trusted online community for developers to learn, share their knowledge, and build their careers.

Visit Stack Exchange

Questions tagged [crayon-licenses]

For questions about non-legalese licenses written by programmers either jokingly or to be understandable.

8
votes
2answers
578 views

Is the Maximum Use License for Everybody (MULE) a FOSS license?

I encountered an obscure software license called the Maximum Use License for Everybody (MULE). (I have used text from version 4 below, but my concerns also apply to version 3.) The license first ...
3
votes
2answers
114 views

How to interpret a one line license?

In a certain open source project I'm planning to use, which is a developmental tool, there is no license included in the project, but the readme contains the following lines: Terms and Conditions ...
22
votes
9answers
6k views

Can I modify an open source license to require that I be notified?

I often use the MIT license for my projects. But recently I've had the thought that I really would like to be notified if someone forked my software, whether it's for personal use, released or not I ...
2
votes
1answer
94 views

Can I include Jenny Everywhere in a licensed work?

Jenny Everywhere is an "open source" character made before there were Creative Commons licenses. When including her in a work you are supposed to include the Jenny Everywhere Paragraph: The ...
0
votes
1answer
111 views

Is a custom license enforcable? [duplicate]

I have written my own license recently which can be found here. If I applied my licence to my work (in the same way I'd apply the MIT license on a GitHub repo for example) would my license be valid ...
10
votes
1answer
171 views

What are the requirements of the crayon license for the Penn Tree Bank Tokenizer

The Penn Treebank tokenizer is fairly widely used. It is a solid tokenizer, that is based only on regex. For example, it is a word tokenizer in NLTK. NLTK does not make mention of it in their LICENSE....
5
votes
2answers
66 views

Using a less common license

In a comment on my question What if anything is wrong with the Apache License 2.0? someone (Zimm) reminded me that its considered bad practice to use a less widely known license. How wildly known is ...
5
votes
1answer
165 views

Is a copyfree license a “crayon” license?

In relationship to my other question What if anything is wrong with the Apache License 2.0? and following on from How can a "crayon" license be a problem? Is a license certified to by ...
1
vote
1answer
256 views

Including resources with ambiguous license for GPL application

I'm creating a GPL v3 application. I've found some graphics on www.flaticon.com that I would like to use in the application. The application will be distributed as binary, but with the resources as-is ...
1
vote
3answers
101 views

Can I create and use my own license or do I need to publish it somewhere? [duplicate]

I have created a license for my apps: This computer program is licensed under Illuze License v1.0.0 or later. Illuze License v1.0.0 [3rdDec2015] -Rahul2001.com It's simple: -You are ...
78
votes
5answers
8k views

How can a “crayon” license be a problem?

Bruce Perens (co-founder of OSI) has coined the term "crayon license": I've been calling these "crayon licenses", taking a line from an old Monty Python sketch about a dog license with the word "...