Questions tagged [agpl-3.0]

For questions about the GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL)

Filter by
Sorted by
Tagged with
7
votes
2answers
456 views

AGPL and Node.js

Supposed I have written a server in Node.js that I licensed under AGPLv3. Now, if somebody takes my code and modifies it, this is a derivative work. So far, so good. Supposed my server has the ...
3
votes
1answer
499 views

Using AGPL v3 software in an enterprise deployment without sharing the changes

An enterprise utilizes the source code of a network software product licensed under the AGPL v3. It modifies the source code but does not share the changes with the original developer and copyright ...
2
votes
1answer
373 views

How can I structure my program to honor the AGPL and a proprietary license scheme?

I am writing an HTML5/JavaScript app (A) with a closed-source license, into which I wish to import data from third-party program (B). I wrote a library to read (B)'s data files, but as it is a ...
12
votes
1answer
1k views

How does AGPL affect Microservices?

So if I had a microservice architecture and one of my services relied on a piece of AGPL software, and that service wasn't customer facing, but a service that communicated with it was, would I be ...
3
votes
2answers
1k views

Monetizing and licensing with AGPL libraries

I am just curious about, what license should i use for app(android), i have written in my free time. I am using some libraries, which have this licenses on it: Apache 2.0 license MIT license GNU ...
4
votes
1answer
112 views

Do I need to share the source for my modified AGPL-licensed MongoDB instance if the user doesn't interact with it directly?

MongoDB positively asserts that a program that uses a MongoDB database does not form a combined work with it. This is nice because my web service that uses MongoDB does not need to be licensed under ...
9
votes
1answer
2k views

Use of AGPL software after developer deleted repository

We use Java libraries for a server application and one of the developers parted ways with us. Since it was his project he can do whatever he wants with the github repository and he chose to delete ...
0
votes
1answer
46 views

License change in Affero licensed software

Some time ago I published the source code for a web application under the GNU AFFERO license, some people forked it and modified it in different ways. Now I would like to modify the original version ...
3
votes
2answers
178 views

AGPLv3 §13 and non-interactive software

See AGPLv3 §13 (Remote Network Interaction). Notwithstanding any other provision of this License, if you modify the Program, your modified version must prominently offer all users interacting ...
3
votes
2answers
987 views

Mixing Apache 2.0 and AGPLv3 in open-source project

I have developed and released an open-source Java library under Apache 2.0 license. In the next version, I plan to include BerkeleyDB as one of the supported storage engines. Note that the actual ...
8
votes
2answers
2k views

License header for dual-licensed (AGPL or "non-free") source code

For one of my products I plan to move from a commercial-only to a dual licensed license model: GNU Affero General Public License (AGPL) or a "non-free" license. I can imagine two options for the ...
5
votes
2answers
1k views

How can I include two open-source libraries in my commercial applications?

I want to include two open-source libraries in my application: Ghostscript and iTextSharp. In 3 commercial applications that I will develop myself: Commercial software will use both above two ...
7
votes
1answer
2k views

How do I license code when rewriting code in another language? [duplicate]

I took the C code from the png2theora example tool of Xiph.Org Theora which has a copyright header: /******************************************************************** * ...
22
votes
1answer
1k views

Can I release under AGPL a program that uses a GPL library?

I just wrote a program that embeds and uses a GNU-GPL library (GPLv3 or at your discretion any later version). Can I release my program under the GNU AGPL v3 license?
5
votes
3answers
299 views

Does a CC BY-SA 4.0 specification lose any AGPL3+ benefits?

If I release a program specification [1] under the AGPL, and the program itself under the AGPL, the two are obviously compatible: I can develop them at the same time, copy text (for example, method ...
4
votes
2answers
205 views

Commercial AGPL application

I'm developing an application using iText. iText, unless a commercial license is purchased, forces you to abide by the AGPL. My plan is to sell commercial pre-compiled copies of my software at a small ...
10
votes
1answer
315 views

What counts as a modification when using a CMS licensed under AGPL 3.0?

On my Web server, I’m using a CMS licensed under AGPL 3.0. I’m required to provide the source code of this CMS only if I have modified it. But what exactly counts as a modification? It certainly is ...
26
votes
3answers
4k views

Do I have to offer the source of an AGPL (v3.0) licensed Web app even if I didn’t modify it?

The point of using the GNU Affero General Public License (Version 3) is that it allows "users who interact with the licensed software over a network to receive the source for that program" (FSF). ...

1 2 3
4