1

Say I convert an AGPL-licensed library from Java to Kotlin using the IntelliJ code conversion functionality, and change the code from there. Can I then use this converted library in my closed source commercial project without violating the AGPL license?

6

In my opinion, no. Machine translation doesn't change the licensing terms on a work any more than converting a Hollywood film from .avi to .mp4 strips the copyright and permits redistribution.

So the machine-translated version is just as AGPL-covered as the original. You then modify it, making a derivative work, which is required by AGPLv3 ss6 and 5c to be distributed under the terms of AGPLv3. Proprietary, closed-source redistribution would violate that.

| improve this answer | |
5

Definitely no. The license is not rendered void simply because you take a programme and translate it into another language; translating existing source code into another language is similarily a derivative of the original work as is adding any feature or other alteration.

See also the license text which reads

A "covered work" means either the unmodified Program or a work based on the Program.

In essence this is the same question as this some time ago concerning GPL v2. However... IANAL.

| improve this answer | |

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.