My company sells Zebra Android devices that we install our own app on (the devices are like a phone, but with scanners and more durable hardware). We can order the devices with the GMS or AOSP operating systems. If we order AOSP then there is less setup, but we would have to load a PDF reader on the device. One solution is to side-load Google's PDF Viewer from APKMirror before distributing the devices to clients.

Since APKMirror states that they manually verify each apps signature I am not too worried about security, but I am confused about how this is licensed. I opened "About this Viewer" from within the app and saw a plethora of Open Source licenses, which all say the app is free to use and distribute. However, I thought all apps provided by the Play Store were licensed only to the individual downloading the application. IE - APKMirror would have to violate the license to generate the APK, unless they received an APK directly from Google.

I understand that each app developer is responsible for licensing their application independently. So, in general, is it enough to verify the signature of the APK from APKMirror and read the license agreement within the app itself to verify that the app is ok to redistribute?

  • 1
    Just because an app uses open source libraries doesn't make it open source itself (unless those libraries are copyleft like the GNU GPL). I can't see anything about Google's Android PDF Viewer that suggests it is open source itself. You can always contact Google yourself. Commented Feb 4, 2020 at 22:48
  • @curiousdannii - But one would presume the app itself would have it's own license, just like every program you install on your desktop.
    – Ian
    Commented Feb 4, 2020 at 22:56
  • Sure, but it's quite likely to be a proprietary licence. If you can't find a public repository for the app then that's what I'd assume. Commented Feb 4, 2020 at 23:21
  • You would think the license could be found somewhere. Is there any legal precedent for what can/can't be done with a piece of software that has no obvious license?
    – Ian
    Commented Feb 5, 2020 at 17:37
  • 1
    @Ian The default license is “all rights reserved”. For an individual who just sideloads apps that they could get for free through the official channels, using APKMirror is likely illegal but not a big deal. But a company would incur significant liability for distributing copyrighted material. E.g. see the Lundgren case where someone was convicted of criminal copyright infringement for recycling gratis software.
    – amon
    Commented Feb 5, 2020 at 19:45

2 Answers 2


If you were making a gaming device and side-loaded Sony apps from APKmirror, how do you think that would turn out? Doing similar with Google apps, for which you don't have written permission to redistribute, could easily turn out the same way. The risk you run is: you will likely get sued (especially if you company/product is successful, or even if your client is successful).

  • 1
    Particularly since there are FOSS PDF readers for Android that you could have used with much less ambiguity.
    – MadHatter
    Commented Feb 7, 2020 at 6:46
  • @MadHatter - Where are they?
    – Ian
    Commented Feb 7, 2020 at 16:52
  • @Ian the same place most of the other free software for Android is: f-droid.org .
    – MadHatter
    Commented Feb 7, 2020 at 17:17
  • @MadHatter - Thankyou. I will recommend this as the approach to take should we need to deploy AOSP.
    – Ian
    Commented Feb 7, 2020 at 17:18

I'm going to try and condense the helpful comments above into a single answer. First of all, permission must be obtained directly from the app developer to legally use/distribute any app from APK Mirror.

APK Mirror protects themselves with the DMCA (https://www.apkmirror.com/dmca-copyright-infringement-notification/). I guess the way it works is that, since they distribute stuff online, their liability is limited by the DMCA so that they need only respond to copyright infringement requests in a prompt manner, and are not held liable if they post an APK that infringes a copyright; provided that the infringement is not obvious to them, and they don't make an effort to hide licensing information.

As a company distributing physical devices, I'm guessing that the DMCA protection would not limit our liability, and there would be no opportunity for us to respond to a cease-and-desist before incurring possible financial consequences.

Therefore, the alternatives are to download stuff from F-Droid (APKs that are explicitly licensed as FOSS), or to contact developers directly and request a license for what can be downloaded from a site like APK Mirror.

However, I am still not sure why mobile apps themselves don't seem to carry licenses within them, like a Windows program would, or what the validity of such a license statement within the app would be.

Please correct/expand any of the points here that are deficient.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.