1

Consider a scenario , I received a software that uses some Apache 2.0 licensed libraries. Software copy I received contains obfuscated codes. Also library part of code is obfuscated.

Since library is coded in java, compiled files will not contain prominent notices of changes made to source. May I ask the author of software where and what changes they made in library? Or May I ask the author to provide a software with atleast not obfuscated library part of code?

  • 1
    Is the fact that files were modified stated somewhere else in the package? The Apache license does not specify how this notification is made. They could have mentioned it in a README file, for example. Also, remember that the Apache license does not require that source code be supplied, so the fact that files are "obfuscated" is not really a license issue here. – Brandin Dec 14 '19 at 10:08
  • See also Can I use a Apache v2 licensed driver for a commercial project without revealing sources of the project?. I.e. it is not required to distribute (unobfuscated) source code to all files. – Brandin Dec 14 '19 at 10:11
  • So, that implies that I can not ask them for source codes. Right? – LaraFlow Dec 14 '19 at 10:21
  • @LaraFlow you are always allowed to ask. But if it it not a copyleft licence then they don't have to respond how you wish. – ctrl-alt-delor Dec 14 '19 at 11:13

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.