1

On choosealicense.com, there's a section that says:

Any open source software license or open license for media (see above) is applicable to software documentation

This implies that the MIT license is suitable for documentation. However, I find it weird that a software license would be applicable to documentation. The MIT license explicitely talks about software. The only part where the documentation appears is on what triggers the license obligations.

2

While re-reading the license again and again, I noticed the slight wording difference that makes it suitable.

this software and associated documentation files (the "Software")

So when software is spelled with a capitalized "S", it means: software + documentation. And that's the capitalized version that is used in all the rest of the document:

rights to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell copies of the Software

So yes, the license applies to the documentation too.

Your Answer

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.