5

Is there a licensing model, or common ethic agreement, prohibiting the leaking of solutions to questions contained in a textbook?

I was searching for solutions to a question in a very popular and internationally used textbook, and found that a solution guide is available to teaching staff whom approach the publisher and can validate that they are in fact a teacher in the field, running a current course, and mandates of students this text. The publishers website is of a very firm opinion that students must not be able to get possession of this solution guide, and it must not be distributed. Surprisingly, I was indeed not able to find a PDF for personal use through my conventional channels.

This book is quite thick; containing approximately 1100 pages and organised into topic chapters. Each chapter is 30-60 pages, and typically 2 pages of this is exercises. If I was to write my own solution guide for every question, cover to cover, and make it open source (allowing others can contribute solutions, corrections, or content), and I was to ensure that no contribution was a direct quote from the solution guide, with the exception of 'true/false' type answers, is it possible that I am violating more than just the publishers wishes?

Is the consensus different in cases where I quote the question prior to answering, instead of referencing the question, and minimally answering?

4

Problems in textbooks are often used in homework or exams. That is the most often cited reason. Besides, having the answers gives the lecturer a (not to be dismissed) advantage in front of the class.

The problems themselves are copyrighted material, whatever you write up as solutions is unambiguously based on them. If this is enough to make it a "derivative work" under the law is something only a lawyer specializing in the area could answer. I'd guess the publisher will fight it, as your solutions will undermine some of the value of the book to the ones deciding to buy it (professors specifying it as the class text and getting the solutions as a side benefit). In any case, courtesy would require to respect the wishes of the author. If the solutions aren't available publicly, don't go against that. If no solutions are available, your idea doesn't grate (so much).

For a student, reading the question and looking up the answer (as the overwhelming minority will tend to do) doesn't lead to learning. Some books instead sometimes only give hints, or even extend the answer much farther than the original question. This is an effective technique with truly motivated readers, which sadly isn't exactly the norm in lower-level courses. To do any of these well is very hard.

  • While I do like the arguments in your answer, I fundamentally disagree that having access to the answers doesn't lead to learning - I find I get the most value out of this approach. Without validation, I find the exercises entirely pointless, and prefer a good and concise chapter summary instead. I feel that those who rely on looking at answers for the sake of progress are only undermining the learning process and penalising themselves. – Éliette Feb 29 '16 at 12:27
  • @Gui, true. Note however that I don't talk about working on the problem, but just going for the official answer. Much of your later job will be solving problems without having where to peek to see if you are right. – vonbrand Feb 29 '16 at 13:21
  • 1
    You're correct - You don't discuss attempting the problem first, then referencing. This is my general approach, and I guess I just assume others do the same. When faced with a question I am unable to answer, I like to work backwards from the proposed solution. I withdraw my criticism! +1 Thanks :) – Éliette Mar 1 '16 at 19:56
-1

have saw similar questions come up multiple times at... www.moodle.org i do not remember direct links right off, but little time searching site should bring back half dozen or more forum threads to read through, for different opinions.

their is a few folks their that belong to "open source" schools per say. and might help you find a lead if you are looking more of open source doing. so you can join in and help out vs trying to come up with something yourself from scratch.

========

remember being in school, and teachers having a couple "teachers books" from different companies due to errors / issues with one vs another. and their were a few times both in K-12 and in collage. teachers complaining about the "agreements" they had to sign.

=========

you need to remember... it is not clear back in the olden days, when there was not internet. and students would sneak over and grab an answer sheet from the test book. and do a quick glance at it, when teacher was not in room / busy talking to other students on opposite side of them. heck students most still likely still do this :/

but rather today... text books "student version" and "teacher version" are more or less exact same copies of each other within there given version. nothing random in order or questions that show up in them. all it would take is one teachers slip up in any school. and a student could look up information online and easily cheat. WOOPS i had this homework, WOOPS it is done, i did not actually do home work though ughs

other words... re-phrasing of questions, different questions, even true/false questions. they need to be different. so as no easy cheating. making it difficult enough for students to cheat. so they actually do homework and/or study.

=============

while teachers are already busy, as is, text book companies are trying to hold on to their work. in today age of times. it could be easy for someone to grab a book and just start inputting stuff into the internet or document. just like illegal downloading of music / videos / games and like. books are illegally scanned in and shared across the internet.

it has happened, not enough books to go around. more than likely someone forgot book, or still waiting for more books to come in (beginning of semester), and teacher just copies some pages from one student book. to hand out to remaining students. (see illegal downloading on internet)

=============

there is only so many ways you can write up X + Y = 4. for books and testing students actually reading the book, there may be more than a few questions that could be asked differently up to a certain point. pending on how many pages student was suppose to read. and/or trying to get student to think about how the book plays out.

moodle for example more likely able to take in 1,000's of questions about a book, and detailed about each page of the book. and randomly spit them out to the student within a range of pages student was suppose to read. if you got your questions from a third party that you had to assign an agreement and/or questions/answers copyrighted. you are tied to that agreement / copyright.

if questions/answers from third party source are copyrighted. and you and/or others. added in additional questions and left them open source. those additional questions i would think would be ok to keep open source. just not the questions you got from third party that are copyrighted.

how ever if there was an additional agreement beyond copyright. (seems over board), but you might be limited in being able to share extra questions pending on the "agreement" you signed. it would be assumed the question shared with all but answers shared among teachers only.

pending on school, you may have some sort of "ethics" aka laws/regulations you may have to abide by. schools are paying teachers, to teach and do there job, not mess around doing something other while being paid. and the schools most likely do not have enough funding to pay a teacher to do something else. schools pay publishers to come up with stuff, to make it easier for teachers to teach.

=============

while above most likely does not answer your question/s directly. perhaps gives a little huh? to long over done lawyer talk in the "agreements" teachers need to sign for the "teacher versions" of books.

to note it. i am for "open source", but generally it comes down to, good old fashion hard work of blood, sweet, and tears, of producing original work. that you choose to make open source, and in that not copying something else. or less it is open source, and agreeing to the "open source agreement" in how information can be exchanged.

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.