Section 4 of the Apache License v2.0 states:
You may add Your own copyright statement to Your modifications and may provide additional or different license terms and conditions for use, reproduction, or distribution of Your modifications, or for any such Derivative Works as a whole, provided Your use, reproduction, and distribution of the Work otherwise complies with the conditions stated in this License.
Let's say I take a software (Work) licensed under the Apache License v2.0, and create a Derivative Work and license it (the Derivative Work) as a whole under the MIT license.
Would the Derivative Work now be compatible to be combined with GPLv2 software, to become licensed under the GPLv2 as a whole, since the MIT license is compatible with the GPLv2 license?
Or would it remain incompatible, because the GPLv2 license is incompatible with the Apache License v2.0?
The quoted paragraph requires compliance with the conditions of the Apache License v2.0 for the distribution of the Work, but not the distribution of the Derivative Work as a whole.