5

I have a question regarding FFmpeg binary distribution and libx265 and GPLv2/3

The FFmpeg documentation says that libx265 is GPLv2-or-later - https://www.ffmpeg.org/general.html#x265 - but the x265 project itself states it is GPLv2 (only) (when used in a Open Source project, and not using the commercial license) - https://www.x265.org/x265-licensing-faq/ . The practical implication of this for binary distribution, as understand it then (if the FFmpeg documentation is wrong), is that one can not release a distribution of FFMpeg under GPLv3 - only GPLv2, if including libx265. Or, Am I missing some reasoning regarding libx265 and FFmpeg binary distribution.

Note: for easier reasoning, let's avoid thinking about other libraries and their license, and just focus on using only libx265 with FFmpeg in a distribution.

2
  • 4
    Your reasoning is sound and you might want to raise an issue with ffmpeg regarding this Oct 20 at 23:11
  • 1
    Thanks for confirming that something is ambigoius, I added an isssue here just now, trac.ffmpeg.org/ticket/9466. Will update here when and If I get anyone to answer:)
    – Beamie
    Oct 21 at 9:51
3

It turned out that The FFmpeg documentation is correct here - libx265 is under GPLv2 or later, which means it can be used as in the use case example in the question - i.e under GPLv3!

However, a user has to look at the source code headers of the X265 code itself to be sure that it is "or-later" (and not "only") - so an suggestion issue was added to the project, that they add the "or-later" in their license FAQ. https://bitbucket.org/multicoreware/x265_git/issues/607/license-faq-enchancement-suggestion. Thanks for the input @planetmaker

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.