Do public content licenses which are not FOSS exist?

Question

All non-source-code and/or source-code public content licenses I have came across are free or open source (FOSS) which reduces the effect of "copyright" to minimum (although not vanish copyright);

Examples for such public content licenses are:

• Public domain licenses (FOSS)
• Creative Commons licenses (possibly FOSS)
• GNU General Public License (FOSS)

While I know that there are private content licenses which are not FOSS, I wonder what about public ones;
Do public content licenses which are not FOSS (which increases the effect of "copyright" to maximum) exist?

Answer 1

Yes, there do exist licenses that broadly endeavor to make a work freely available (and often modifiable and redistributable, too) but are not FOSS licenses.

For examples, see the "Nonfree Software Licenses" section on the FSF's Various Licenses and Comments about Them page, many of which are obviously intended to grant a high degree of freedom but are nevertheless not FOSS for one reason or another. The page usually explains what particular point(s) cause each license to be nonfree.