Timeline for How does one combine differently licensed code in one open source program?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 13, 2015 at 9:43 | vote | accept | Pepijn Schmitz | ||
| Jul 8, 2015 at 15:37 | comment | added | ArtOfCode | @PepijnSchmitz Fair points, and that is indeed OK. | |
| Jul 8, 2015 at 15:31 | comment | added | Pepijn Schmitz | I'm leaning towards not including the text of the Apache license, just because it might be confusing. The consensus appears to be that it is not necessary since WorldPainter would still be completely GPLv3, and having the APLv2 present might give the impression that it is dual-licensed or something like that. | |
| Jul 8, 2015 at 15:29 | comment | added | Pepijn Schmitz | Yes, to be clear: I intend for WorldPainter to remain GPLv3. | |
| Jul 8, 2015 at 12:25 | comment | added | ArtOfCode | @BartvanIngenSchenau Yep, just making the point that it's OP's choice of license. If he wants to make the project WTFPL instead, he can. | |
| Jul 8, 2015 at 12:21 | comment | added | Bart van Ingen Schenau | Re 2.: If dynmap and those modified files are distributed as part of a GPLv3 project, then the GPL claims to apply to those parts as well. In that sense, they are GPLv3. | |
| Jul 8, 2015 at 11:57 | history | answered | ArtOfCode | CC BY-SA 3.0 |