Timeline for Open-source license to prevent commercial use?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 4, 2020 at 8:02 | comment | added | planetmaker | Yes agreed, this likely is what's asked for by the op | |
| Mar 4, 2020 at 8:02 | comment | added | MikeBeaton | I think in my answer I've been clear to distinguish between source-available and open-source! Let me know if not! | |
| Mar 4, 2020 at 8:01 | comment | added | MikeBeaton | Of course it does, that's what I say. What the question asks for is impossible (under the very strict, official definition of open-source). But what it's presumably asking for, I think, is something like this? | |
| Mar 4, 2020 at 7:58 | comment | added | planetmaker | But exactly the non - commercial passage makes it a non - open source license. So both demands cannot be reconciled if you take the generally accepted definition of open source as used by OSI. So these licenses and questions are of - topic here | |
| Mar 4, 2020 at 7:40 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 4, 2020 at 11:01 | |||||
| Mar 4, 2020 at 7:36 | history | answered | MikeBeaton | CC BY-SA 4.0 |