Timeline for How much is "substantial portion" in MIT licence?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2021 at 8:26 | comment | added | Top-Master |
MIT defines the word Software's meaning for us in [this software and associated documentation files (the "Software")] paragraph, and obviously MIT paragraph starts with "this software" (not "the Software") and puts the quotes around "Software" alone (meaning, wherever "Software" is mentioned from that point on, their original content was meant) and later MIT asks "substantial portions of the Software" to attribute, but remember that Software is their original work (i.e. if you got binary from them, then you must attribute where ever you use that binary, else just ensure you compile/Uglify)
|
|
| Dec 24, 2017 at 10:58 | history | edited | Mureinik | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fixed typos
|
| Dec 20, 2015 at 12:21 | vote | accept | Marqin | ||
| Dec 12, 2015 at 15:00 | history | edited | curiousdannii |
edited tags
|
|
| Dec 11, 2015 at 2:30 | answer | added | congusbongus | timeline score: 23 | |
| Dec 11, 2015 at 1:40 | history | migrated | from programmers.stackexchange.com (revisions) | ||
| Dec 11, 2015 at 1:24 | history | asked | Marqin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |