Is there any point to complying with the licence which comes with project published anonymously (like initial Bitcoin source code)?

If so, in case of breaking the rules of your license, who has the right to enforce the aspects of a license if nobody takes the ownership of the project? So basically, can you do whatever you want?

Is there any point in complying with the licence which comes with a project published anonymously (like the initial Bitcoin source code)?

If so, in case of breaking the rules of your license, who has the right to enforce the aspects of a license if nobody takes the ownership of the project? So basically, can you do whatever you want?

Is there any point to complying with the licence which comes with project published anonymously (like initial Bitcoin source code)?

If so, in case of breaking the rules of your license, who has the right to enforce the aspects of a license if nobody takes the ownership of the project?

Is there any point to complying with the licence which comes with project published anonymously (like initial Bitcoin source code)?

If so, in case of breaking the rules of your license, who has the right to enforce the aspects of a license if nobody takes the ownership of the project? So basically, can you do whatever you want?

Is there any point of complying with the licence which comes with project published anonymously (like initial Bitcoin source code)?

If so, in case of breaking the rules of your license, who have the right to enforce the aspects of a license if nobody takes the ownership of the project?

Is there any point to complying with the licence which comes with project published anonymously (like initial Bitcoin source code)?

If so, in case of breaking the rules of your license, who has the right to enforce the aspects of a license if nobody takes the ownership of the project?