Timeline for Extent of adapted material "contagion" in Wikipedia style CC BY-SA licenses
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 2 at 8:04 | vote | accept | Dan | ||
| Jul 1 at 5:35 | history | edited | MadHatter♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body; edited title
|
| Jul 1 at 5:35 | answer | added | MadHatter♦ | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jun 28 at 20:33 | comment | added | Dan | I withdraw my point about Wikipedia's use of CC images in articles, thanks to @Giacomo Catenazzi 's answer. However my main point stands. How does one draw the line between what the ODbL would call a collection (a "Collective Database" in their context) and an adaptation (a "Derivative Database" in their context) in the context of CC-BY-SA licenced data? This lack of clarity is making me shy of using SA licenced datasets at all, even though it would be less work to abandon the less fundamental SA content rather than find CC-BY/CC0/OGL sources. | |
| Jun 28 at 12:29 | answer | added | Giacomo Catenazzi | timeline score: 0 | |
| S Jun 27 at 16:20 | review | First questions | |||
| Jun 27 at 20:00 | |||||
| S Jun 27 at 16:20 | history | asked | Dan | CC BY-SA 4.0 |