Top new questions this week:
|
|
The text of the CC-BY-SA 3.0 license mentions the following:
You may Distribute or Publicly Perform an Adaptation only under the terms of:
(i) this License;
(ii) a later version of this ...
|
|
Currently there's a discussion on Meta over whether or not StackExchange was allowed to retrospectively change their licensing policy from CC SA 3.0 to CC SA 4.0. Presuming that it is indeed an open ...
|
|
According to Wikipedia's official copyright FAQ:
According to the WMF legal team, CC BY-SA 4.0 is not backwards compatible with CC BY-SA 3.0. Therefore, mixing text licenses under 3.0 and 4.0 ...
|
|
One of my projects is in Github and currently it does not have any license such as MIT. Therefore, it should be considered as an Open Source project by default.
But, I wish that if anyone uses this ...
|
|
I am have some images which has following license:
Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License
Using these images I am going to make an Android app and sell it via Google play ...
|
|
I want to use license GPLv3 in my open source project on GitHub. And I want to ask how can I do that?
I have read an article and I have understood that:
My repo has to have a file License, that ...
|
|
It looks like Creative Commons only allows a relicensing from CC-BY-SA 3.0 to CC-BY-SA 4.0 for derivative works:
You may Distribute or Publicly Perform an Adaptation only under the terms of:
(i) ...
|
Greatest hits from previous weeks:
|
|
I have a few questions regarding the GPLv2 license:
For it to be GPLv2, I need provide access to my source files?
If I use the v2 license, but charge for use, do users HAVE to purchase my license in ...
|
|
MongoDB has decided to change the licensing of MongoDB Community Server, seemingly to prevent businesses from monetizing on their product without giving anything back: ...
|
|
There is a case between Google and Oracle over the use of Java and it's standard library on the Google Android operating system. From [this article]:
To recap: Oracle accused Google of ...
|
|
As I know, Linux intentionally avoids the switch from GPLv2 to GPLv3. It has the unfortunate side-effect, that it doesn't take part in the defense of the opensource world from the most recent danger, ...
|
|
As we all know, the GNU General Public License (GPL) is a "copyleft" source license: which means it is designed not merely to make the code to which it is initially applied free and preserve its ...
|
|
Here's a tricky situation that I didn't encounter before:
My company embeds a piece of slightly modified GPLv3 code into their otherwise proprietary application. They don't link a library or ...
|
|
My company is very sensitive about using open source software. A small team started to group licences in three categories: green, yellow, red.
Flutter is a library to create native apps for ios and ...
|
