Open Source Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people organizing, marketing or licensing open source development projects. It only takes a minute to sign up.

Sign up to join this community
Anybody can ask a question
Anybody can answer
The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Explore our questions

-3 votes
1 answer
63 views

According to this web site unless I am sharing or selling my website code I dont have to attribute anything about the mit license, is that truth?

4 votes
2 answers
169 views

Licence that says the original author must be given credit, but is otherwise mostly free

0 votes
0 answers
38 views

Open source HTML/CSS/JAVA code under GPLv3 license - implication if used for public company website?

9 votes
2 answers
1k views

Dual license Apache2.0 GPLv3 for a library with optional GPLed code

4 votes
2 answers
700 views

Can I use LGPL3 for library and Apache 2 for "main()"?

17 votes
2 answers
6k views

License that requires attribution to end users?

5 votes
2 answers
88 views

Can I mix CC-BY-SA 3.0 and CC-BY-SA 4.0 artwork? How to license output of such mix, such as a screenshot? Is it even having a license?

1 vote
1 answer
76 views

Should I include the licenses of my dependencies' dependencies?

1 vote
2 answers
83 views

Is there any license which is based off on AGPL, but provides exemptions for the owner to allow others use it under a different license?

12 votes
4 answers
4k views

Is requiring a link to my site allowed for a FOSS license?

-1 votes
1 answer
81 views

MIT License technicalities and compatibility with Apache 2.0

5 votes
1 answer
103 views

Would a YouTuber fall in trouble for recording a walkthough of a Game that uses music licensed under CC BY 3.0?

19 votes
1 answer
16k views

Pros and Cons of using MPL-2.0 license?

3 votes
1 answer
937 views

Can Qt be used in company project?

Browse more Questions