Open Source Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for people organizing, marketing or licensing open source development projects. It only takes a minute to sign up.

Sign up to join this community
Anybody can ask a question
Anybody can answer
The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

Explore our questions

2 votes
0 answers
50 views

Right to modify proprietary software linked to LGPLv2.1-licensed library?

12 votes
4 answers
8k views

Linking from LGPL 2.1 software to Apache 2.0 library

4 votes
3 answers
737 views

Is it possible to link an LGPL v2.1 software with a proprietary library?

1 vote
1 answer
78 views

Does GPL apply to optional and disabled code and no linking

3 votes
2 answers
259 views

Am I allowed to statically link a LGPL-2.1+ library into a GPL3-licensed library?

2 votes
1 answer
87 views

Do I have to comply with the LGPL when using a BSD-licensed library in a closed-source application, which then uses other LGPL-licensed libraries?

5 votes
2 answers
185 views

Are the terms of LGPL 3.0 already covered by GPL 3.0 aggregate definition

5 votes
3 answers
961 views

Is LGPL OK for mostly header only library?

5 votes
3 answers
301 views

GPL and Linking Exceptions

5 votes
2 answers
427 views

LGPL licensed software distributed with cx_Freeze

3 votes
1 answer
49 views

LGPL and DT_RPATH compatibility

5 votes
1 answer
1k views

If I use an LGPL library do I have to release the full source code of my project?

4 votes
1 answer
168 views

Which license I should use for public project?

3 votes
2 answers
314 views

Finding right license to support open source community only. GPLv3 too strict, LGPLv3 too permissive

Browse more Questions